Professional cable manufacturer
SORIVO · Buying Note · Cable Commercial Terms · 2026-09
We do not publish a static price list, and this page will not pretend to be one. What we do publish is the arithmetic that lets you audit any cable quote you receive this month — including ours — line by line, plus the seven columns a quote has to carry before its numbers mean anything.
Before you compare two quotes, compute the metal. Copper mass per metre is the cross-section times the density of copper: a 4 mm² conductor is 4 cm³ per metre, about 35.6 g/m. At an LME anchor of US$13,500/t — the figure we used in our 2026 solar price guide — that is $0.48 per metre of copper in a 4 mm² cable, $0.72 at 6 mm², $1.20 at 10 mm², and $8.40 per metre in each 70 mm² core of an armoured LV cable. Tinning adds roughly 8 % to the conductor.
That single line of arithmetic does three jobs: it tells you the floor a genuine cable cannot be sold below, it tells you how much of any quote is actually metal (we publish our own cost model in section 03: raw copper 55–65 % of finished cost), and it tells you what a $500/t move in the LME does to your price — about $0.018/m on 4 mm², $0.045/m on 10 mm². Everything else on a quotation sheet is insulation compound, labour, testing, freight, margin, and duty.
Two honest reasons. First, a cable price is a copper price with a specification attached, and the copper leg moves monthly — a list dated March is wrong by June. Second, a per-metre number without its conditions is not information, it is ammunition for the wrong decision. $0.72/m means one thing for a tinned Class 5 conductor certified to EN 50618 across every cross-section, and something else entirely for a bare-copper cable whose certificate covers one size.
What we will do is show the arithmetic, state our cost model, and send the current sheet on request — with the copper basis, the validity date and the certification scope printed on it. That is the version a purchasing committee can actually use.
copper $/m = ( cross-section in mm² ÷ 100 ) × 100 cm × 8.89 g/cm³ × ( LME $/t ÷ 1,000,000 )
Written less compactly: the mass of copper in one metre of a solid-equivalent conductor is the cross-section in mm² multiplied by 8.89 g per metre per mm². Multiply that by the metal price and you have the part of the quote that nobody can argue with. Stranding adds a little, tinning adds about 8 %, and insulation, armour and sheath sit on top.
| Cross-section | Copper mass (g/m) | Copper value ($/m) | With tinning +8 % ($/m) | Move per +$500/t ($/m) | Where you buy this size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 mm² | 22.2 | 0.300 | 0.324 | +0.011 | Residential PV strings, short runs, control |
| 4 mm² | 35.6 | 0.480 | 0.518 | +0.018 | The standard PV string cable |
| 6 mm² | 53.3 | 0.720 | 0.778 | +0.027 | Longer strings, higher current, drop-limited runs |
| 10 mm² | 88.9 | 1.200 | 1.296 | +0.045 | Combiner-to-inverter DC, small AC tails |
| 16 mm² | 142.2 | 1.920 | 2.074 | +0.071 | DC mains, LV feeder tails |
| 70 mm² | 622.3 | 8.401 | — | +0.311 | LV armoured feeder (a 4×70 cable holds ~2.49 kg/m of copper) |
| 240 mm² | 2,133.6 | 28.804 | — | +1.067 | Single-core large feeder, 4×240 is ~8.5 kg/m of copper |
This is our cost model, published so you can interrogate a quote against it — including ours. It is the same four-block breakdown we used in the solar price guide, and it is a statement about our supply chain, not an industry average.
| Block | Share of finished cost | What actually moves it |
|---|---|---|
| Raw copper (and tinning) | 55–65 % | LME, plus the tinning and stranding premium. This is the block a $500/t move touches |
| Insulation and sheath compound | 12–18 % | XLPO costs multiples of PVC per kilogram; UV stabiliser package, halogen-free chemistry, and armour wire on top |
| Manufacture and testing | 10–15 % | Extrusion and cross-linking line time, batch QC, type testing and annual factory-audit costs spread over volume |
| Logistics and margin | 8–18 % | Incoterms choice, freight, warehousing, and how much local stock the seller is carrying for you |
The search that brings most buyers here is a size question dressed as a price question. So do it on the arithmetic rather than on the per-metre number, because the per-metre number is the smallest part of the decision.
Resistance scales inversely with cross-section, so going from 4 mm² to 6 mm² costs 50 % more metal and cuts resistance by a third; going to 10 mm² costs 150 % more metal and cuts resistance by roughly 60 %. What you get for it, on a real string: 15 A over 50 m one-way, conductor at 60 °C, tinned copper resistance from IEC 60228.
| Size | R at 60 °C (Ω/km, tinned) | Voltage drop, 100 m loop at 15 A | As % of a 700 V string | Loss in the run | Copper + tin, per 100 m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 mm² | 5.73 | 8.6 V | 1.23 % | 129 W | $52 |
| 6 mm² | 3.82 | 5.7 V | 0.82 % | 86 W | $78 |
| 10 mm² | 2.26 | 3.4 V | 0.48 % | 51 W | $130 |
Ask any supplier — us or anyone else — for a sheet with these columns, and half your comparison work disappears.
Column 4 and column 7 are where the arguments happen. Our contract clause note covers the wording we accept on copper-index and delivery liability; the FOB vs CIF vs DDP guide covers column 5 and why the same cable can be quoted three different ways.
Two things move a landed cost faster than the copper index, and neither of them is the cable.
For the metal side, our copper price survival guide covers how a factory handles a rising index without repricing every shipment, which is the practical version of column 4.
| Product family | Standard | Copper + tin floor ($/m, from Table 1) | FOB range ($/m) | MOQ | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1Z2Z2-K 4 mm² solar cable | EN 50618 | 0.518 | — | — | — |
| H1Z2Z2-K 6 mm² solar cable | EN 50618 | 0.778 | — | — | — |
| H1Z2Z2-K 10 mm² solar cable | EN 50618 | 1.296 | — | — | — |
| ESS / BESS DC cable | TUV 2PfG 2693 (per product page) | size-dependent | — | — | — |
| CU/XLPE/SWA/PVC 4×70 mm² LV armoured | IEC 60502-1 | 33.60 (all 4 cores) | — | — | — |
| THHN/THWN-2 10 AWG building wire | UL 83 | size-dependent | — | — | — |
Copy this into an email. It takes a buyer ninety seconds and it removes most of the reasons a quotation comes back useless.
Send the eight lines above and we return a price sheet carrying the LME basis date, the FOB band per size, MOQ per cross-section, lead time and the certificate scope — the three columns Table 4 leaves to the factory, filled in and dated. One email, no form to complete.
Not as a static PDF on this page, deliberately. A per-metre cable price is a copper price with a specification attached, and the metal leg moves monthly, so a downloadable list goes stale between quarters and gets quoted back to us out of date. What we send on request is the same table with a stated LME basis, a validity date, MOQ per cross-section and the certificate scope — which is the version a purchasing committee can act on.
Do the metal first. Copper mass per metre is cross-section in mm² times 8.89 g; at an LME anchor of $13,500/t that is $0.48/m of copper in a 4 mm² conductor, $0.72/m at 6 mm² and $1.20/m at 10 mm², with about 8 % more if the conductor is tinned. If a quoted FOB price sits at or below that metal figure, the insulation, labour, testing and margin are not in it — which means one of the four blocks in our cost model is not what the specification claims. Then compare quotes on identical incoterms, quantities, certificate scope and validity date.
Because resistance scales inversely with cross-section: 6 mm² has about two-thirds of the resistance of 4 mm² for 50 % more metal. On a 15 A string with 50 m of run each way, our worked example drops from 8.6 V to 5.7 V of drop and from 129 W to 86 W of loss, for roughly $26 more copper per 100 m. Where length or a tight drop budget is the binding constraint, that is the cheapest engineering available; on short runs it is usually an unnecessary upgrade.
It is the largest single block in the price, and it moves. A $500/t change in LME copper shifts the metal value of 4 mm² cable by about $0.018 per metre and 10 mm² by about $0.045 per metre. On a 100 km order of 4 mm² cable that is roughly $1,800 of metal alone — which is why a serious quotation states its index basis and validity period, and why a price that has not moved in six months deserves a question about the specification.
No, and they should not be hidden inside one. For US-bound cable, duty depends on the exact 10-digit classification, the origin and smelt-and-cast evidence, and the Chapter 99 provisions in force on the entry date — the copper Section 232 measures now apply to the full customs value rather than to metal content. We quote FOB with the classification facts stated, and the duty arithmetic belongs with your broker; our 2026 duties guide explains the layers.
Ask, and say what the application is. What we will not do is quote a category we do not build. If your specification calls for a product outside our published range, we will tell you that plainly rather than substitute something that reads the same on a datasheet — that is the fastest way to make a cheap cable expensive.
Send the sizes, quantities, destination and the certificate scope you need. We return a quotation with the copper basis, validity period, MOQ and lead time stated — the three columns this page leaves blank.

This is a commercial guidance note, not a price offer or a contract. Prices, duties and freight change; nothing on this page is a quotation until it is dated and addressed to you.